Le contenu de ce message de forum a été supprimé et n'est plus accessible.
Best practice forum (Archived)
Cette discussion de forum a été supprimée
Ce message du forum a été supprimé
Re: LPs, Competency Hierarchies and Appraisals
Hi Maurice,
I think this would be difficult - especially with a deep hierarchy, we're not sure how we could represent this.
regards,
George.
Ce message du forum a été supprimé
Le contenu de ce message de forum a été supprimé et n'est plus accessible.
Ce message du forum a été supprimé
Le contenu de ce message de forum a été supprimé et n'est plus accessible.
Ce message du forum a été supprimé
Le contenu de ce message de forum a été supprimé et n'est plus accessible.
Re: LPs, Competency Hierarchies and Appraisals
Hi Maurice,
The order of the competencies in the appraisal defaults to the order they were put in. Ill in an enhancement bug, though to be consistent with other parts of Totara we will have to order them in alphabetically. As for the hierarchy structure it may be best if you approach your partner regarding this for some custom work, our resources at the moment are focusing on existing feature requests (https://totara.community/mod/feedback/analysis.php?id=1718&courseid&do_show=analysis) and the development of 2.6.
regards,
George,
Re: LPs, Competency Hierarchies and Appraisals
Hi Maurice.
I think you can get the result you want by changing line 133 of totara/question/field/compfromplan.class.php to read
ORDER BY comp.idnumber';
instead of
ORDER BY reviewdata.itemid';
I did a quick test and it seems to do what you want, but it needs some testing to be sure.
Nathan