Best practice forum (Archived)

该论坛讨论已删除

 
该论坛帖子已被删除
2014年03月31日 Monday 19:19
该论坛帖子的内容已被删除，无法再访问。
 
永久链接 | 回复
me
Re: LPs, Competency Hierarchies and Appraisals
由 AngusGeorge 发表于 2014年03月31日 Monday 21:06
小组 Totara

Hi Maurice,

I think this would be difficult - especially with a deep hierarchy, we're not sure how we could represent this.

regards,

George.

 
永久链接 | 显示父帖子 | 回复
该论坛帖子已被删除
2014年04月1日 Tuesday 12:46
该论坛帖子的内容已被删除，无法再访问。
 
永久链接 | 显示父帖子 | 回复
该论坛帖子已被删除
2014年04月1日 Tuesday 13:21
该论坛帖子的内容已被删除，无法再访问。
 
永久链接 | 显示父帖子 | 回复
该论坛帖子已被删除
2014年04月1日 Tuesday 15:06
该论坛帖子的内容已被删除，无法再访问。
 
永久链接 | 显示父帖子 | 回复
me
Re: LPs, Competency Hierarchies and Appraisals
由 AngusGeorge 发表于 2014年04月1日 Tuesday 20:59
小组 Totara

Hi Maurice,

The order of the competencies in the appraisal defaults to the order they were put in. Ill in an enhancement bug, though to be consistent with other parts of Totara we will have to order them in alphabetically. As for the hierarchy structure it may be best if you approach your partner regarding this for some custom work, our resources at the moment are focusing on existing feature requests (https://totara.community/mod/feedback/analysis.php?id=1718&courseid&do_show=analysis) and the development of 2.6.

regards,

George,

 
永久链接 | 显示父帖子 | 回复
LewisNathan
Re: LPs, Competency Hierarchies and Appraisals
由 LewisNathan 发表于 2014年04月1日 Tuesday 21:11
小组 Totara

Hi Maurice.

I think you can get the result you want by changing line 133 of totara/question/field/compfromplan.class.php to read

ORDER BY comp.idnumber';

instead of

ORDER BY reviewdata.itemid';

I did a quick test and it seems to do what you want, but it needs some testing to be sure.

Nathan

 
永久链接 | 显示父帖子 | 回复