Hi Amir

This is great question and one we'd also like to know if others have developed an approach on.

Below is our collection of frameworks - although this shouldn't be considered best or even good practice.  We found that the act of bring the various frameworks already in use across the business together in one place is the hardest part - as each area has significantly different approaches. Few were compatible with each other.

Cheers
Austen

Hi Amir,

From a functionality point of view there are only really three differences I can think of:

1. If you need to use different competency scales, you need to use different frameworks as each framework is assigned exactly one scale.

2. The UI for selecting competencies is different if you use separate frameworks. You get a pulldown menu in the dialogs and have the ability to search by framework or across all.

3. There is a little known feature called competency aggregation, which allows you to set the competency status based on the status of child competencies. If that is enabled, using separate frameworks would prevent aggregation.

Hope that helps,

Simon