Best practice forum (Archived)

Die Forendiskussion wurde entfernt

 
Dieser Forumsbeitrag wurde entfernt
Saturday, 16 November 2013, 7:58 AM
Der Inhalt des Forumsbeitrags wurde gelöscht und kann nicht weiter angezeigt werden.
Simon Coggins
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
von Simon Coggins – Sunday, 17 November 2013, 11:47 AM
Gruppe Totara

Good idea, I'll file an enhancement ticket.

Be aware that at the moment some of the new report sources are only available as embedded reports - we are working on making them available as user generated sources too but there are some issues we have to resolve first.

Simon

Daniel Bond
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
von Daniel Bond – Monday, 18 November 2013, 1:41 AM
Gruppe Most helpful contributor 2023

A definite +1 from me, and for much the same reasons: The ability to provide reporting up the management hierachy would be a very useful feature for us to say the least.

Simon Coggins
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
von Simon Coggins – Monday, 18 November 2013, 12:01 PM
Gruppe Totara

When you say "up the management hierarchy" which way is "up"? Do you mean:

1. Ability to a manager to see records of their staff, and their staff's staff, and their staff's, staff's, staff, etc.

or

2. Ability for a staff member to see their manager's records, and their manager's manager's records, etc.

I can see the use case for 1 but if you mean 2 can you explain a bit more about how you might use this?

Simon

 

Dieser Forumsbeitrag wurde entfernt
Monday, 18 November 2013, 1:11 PM
Der Inhalt des Forumsbeitrags wurde gelöscht und kann nicht weiter angezeigt werden.
Daniel Bond
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
von Daniel Bond – Tuesday, 19 November 2013, 1:27 AM
Gruppe Most helpful contributor 2023

Oh, I definitely meant that a manager could see the details for all of those in the position / organisation below theirs. I would ideally like the same cascading arrangement for "manager" as there is for "position" and "organisation" (i.e.  not just direct team but indirect team), but I know that's a bigger question for all of the report sources rather than just this one.

I can indeed see that option 2 wouldn't make sense, fear not!