Best practice forum (Archived)

La discussione è stata rimossa.

 
L'intervento è stato rimosso
Saturday, 16 November 2013, 07:58
Il contenuto di questo intervento è stato rimosso, non è più possibile visualizzarlo.
Simon Coggins
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
di Simon Coggins - Sunday, 17 November 2013, 11:47
Gruppo Totara

Good idea, I'll file an enhancement ticket.

Be aware that at the moment some of the new report sources are only available as embedded reports - we are working on making them available as user generated sources too but there are some issues we have to resolve first.

Simon

Daniel Bond
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
di Daniel Bond - Monday, 18 November 2013, 01:41
Gruppo Most helpful contributor 2023

A definite +1 from me, and for much the same reasons: The ability to provide reporting up the management hierachy would be a very useful feature for us to say the least.

Simon Coggins
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
di Simon Coggins - Monday, 18 November 2013, 12:01
Gruppo Totara

When you say "up the management hierarchy" which way is "up"? Do you mean:

1. Ability to a manager to see records of their staff, and their staff's staff, and their staff's, staff's, staff, etc.

or

2. Ability for a staff member to see their manager's records, and their manager's manager's records, etc.

I can see the use case for 1 but if you mean 2 can you explain a bit more about how you might use this?

Simon

 

L'intervento è stato rimosso
Monday, 18 November 2013, 13:11
Il contenuto di questo intervento è stato rimosso, non è più possibile visualizzarlo.
Daniel Bond
Re: Suggested enhancement to goal report sources
di Daniel Bond - Tuesday, 19 November 2013, 01:27
Gruppo Most helpful contributor 2023

Oh, I definitely meant that a manager could see the details for all of those in the position / organisation below theirs. I would ideally like the same cascading arrangement for "manager" as there is for "position" and "organisation" (i.e.  not just direct team but indirect team), but I know that's a bigger question for all of the report sources rather than just this one.

I can indeed see that option 2 wouldn't make sense, fear not!