Another scenario that we often have coming up in certifications is how to deal with users who are not active for some reason e.g.
- a short period like annual leave
- longer like parental leave
- they leave the organisation and come back (common where the learners are casual, sessional or on short term contracts)
Clients have tried a number of solutions:
- If you leave them in the audience assigning them to the certification, the completion stats are inaccurate and this is particularly a problem for compliance courses
- It isn't always appropriate to suspend the user and exclude them from reports
- If you remove them from the audience, when they return their certification may be expired and there has to be manual intervention which is not feasible with a large number of users
- Multiple certifications for the same course content means complex, confusing configuration in the certification and audiences, and reporting has to look at multiple certifications - not easy for managers especially
It is often difficult to get good leave dates from HR systems, because of the complexity of users' leave arrangements (e.g. multiple types of leave being used for a period of absence), so that would make an automated extension based on that data difficult in many cases.
We've considered a range of options including 'pausing' the certification timer, being able to add on a period equal to their period of leave/absence, or enabling a bulk manual upload of new window open dates. There may be a way to deal with this with existing functionalityvthat I'm missing, but so far, I haven't been able to work one out.
I realise that the logic could become very complex. I think what might work is that the administrator of each certification can set rules about what happens if the user is unassigned from a certification, is reassigned, and then their certification has expired.
- In some cases, you'd want the certification stay as expired.
- Do they return to the original path, or do they go into the re-certification path with a new assigned date, window open and required completion date?
- Maybe time periods are required also e.g. if unassigned for less than x period and their certification expires, they are assigned to recertification, but if longer than y period then they're treated like a new hire.
This has to be automated where there are a large number of users - manual intervention isn't feasible whether it's by managers or, as in many organisations with compliance training requirements, by the compliance team of even the LMS administrators. It's going to vary by certification, so I don't think central rules will do it.
An 'expired and extend' email to a manager, for example, won't work. In many organisations, while managers might be responsible for making sure that their team members complete assigned training, the learning is assigned automatically and further, the manager isn't responsible for giving extensions on dates and won't have the skills to do anything technical.