Suggest Totara Learn features

Define recertification pathways

 
Georgina Christodoulou
Define recertification pathways
by Georgina Christodoulou - Monday, 25 May 2020, 4:17 PM
Group PartnersGroup TXP Site Administrator

Have additional configuration whereby an admin determines whether or when a learner stays on the recert path or is routed to the original certification path.

A couple of scenarios come to mind:

Scenario One

Admin creates a certification with an original certification course set which is a "full" course or set of courses.

As the recertification pathway the administrator creates a different pathway with a "refresher" course.

The admin only wants people to remain on the recertification pathway even if the user becomes expired. They do not want the user to go back to the original certification.


Scenario Two

Example in Australia with First Aid people complete their First Aid Course which needs to be repeated every three years and the CPR component needs to be refreshed every 12 months.

So it would look like this:

Year One - First Aid Course 

Year Two - CPR course

Year Three - CPR course

Year Four - Go back to year one and repeat the cycle...

Matt Barets
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Matt Barets - Tuesday, 26 May 2020, 1:38 AM
 

Hi Geanz

We would like to see that kind of feature implemented too.

We cover your both scenario, with a dozen of certifications that would match your scenario one and the First Aid in the UK follows the same pattern: Initial course > Refresher > Refresher > Initial course.

Being able to configure the certification/recertification path to match these scenarios would be great,

Regards

Matt

Lynsey Strydom
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Lynsey Strydom - Tuesday, 26 May 2020, 6:20 AM
Group PartnersGroup TXP Site Administrator
This would be useful to us too, we have a multiple courses which have 'annual logbook' days and then a refresher.

E.g.

Year 1 - Initial Course (5 Day)

Year 2 - Logbook Day (1 Day)

Year 3 - Logbook Day (1 Day)

Year 4 - Requalification (3 Day)

Then repeat the cycle from Year 2 etc.


Tracey Brighton
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Tracey Brighton - Monday, 22 June 2020, 8:43 PM
 
This is an absolute requirement for our regional health services at SWARH. Fully support this feature request as a priority.
Ashleigh Richardson
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Ashleigh Richardson - Sunday, 25 July 2021, 7:45 PM
 
Hi, 


Just here to show my support to this feature too. It would make Certifications infinitely more usable and much easier for managers to interoperate, rather than wonky work-arounds.

Duncan Eeles
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Duncan Eeles - Thursday, 16 July 2020, 5:50 AM
Group Good learner 2023Group Partners

A big +1 one for a few clients of ours. 

Mark Carey
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Mark Carey - Tuesday, 1 June 2021, 11:13 PM
Group Partners

Another scenario that we often have coming up in certifications is how to deal with users who are not active for some reason e.g.

  • a short period like annual leave
  • longer like parental leave
  • they leave the organisation and come back (common where the learners are casual, sessional or on short term contracts)

Clients have tried a number of solutions:

  • If you leave them in the audience assigning them to the certification, the completion stats are inaccurate and this is particularly a problem for compliance courses
  • It isn't always appropriate to suspend the user and exclude them from reports
  • If you remove them from the audience, when they return their certification may be expired and there has to be manual intervention which is not feasible with a large number of users
  • Multiple certifications for the same course content means complex, confusing configuration in the certification and audiences, and reporting has to look at multiple certifications - not easy for managers especially

It is often difficult to get good leave dates from HR systems, because of the complexity of users' leave arrangements (e.g. multiple types of leave being used for a period of absence), so that would make an automated extension based on that data difficult in many cases.

We've considered a range of options including 'pausing' the certification timer, being able to add on a period equal to their period of leave/absence, or enabling a bulk manual upload of new window open dates. There may be a way to deal with this with existing functionalityvthat I'm missing, but so far, I haven't been able to work one out.

I realise that the logic could become very complex. I think what might work is that the administrator of each certification can set rules about what happens if the user is unassigned from a certification, is reassigned, and then their certification has expired.

  • In some cases, you'd want the certification stay as expired.
  • Do they return to the original path, or do they go into the re-certification path with a new assigned date, window open and required completion date? 
  • Maybe time periods are required also e.g. if unassigned for less than x period and their certification expires, they are assigned to recertification, but if longer than y period then they're treated like a new hire.

This has to be automated where there are a large number of users - manual intervention isn't feasible whether it's by managers or, as in many organisations with compliance training requirements, by the compliance team of even the LMS administrators.  It's going to vary by certification, so I don't think central rules will do it.

An 'expired and extend' email to a manager, for example, won't work. In many organisations, while managers might be responsible for making sure that their team members complete assigned training, the learning is assigned automatically and further, the manager isn't responsible for giving extensions on dates and won't have the skills to do anything technical.


Craig Eves
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Craig Eves (Totara Support) - Thursday, 3 June 2021, 7:27 PM
Group Totara

Hi Mark

There is some documentation on what happens when a user is reassigned.

When a user is reassigned to a certification their latest unassigned certification completion record is restored and the user is placed into the primary certification path. The certification crons process the dates of the restored record and the appropriate action for the user is taken based on expiry dates and they may be assigned to the recertification path.

Regards

Mark Carey
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Mark Carey - Monday, 20 September 2021, 5:50 AM
Group Partners

Hi Craig,

Thanks for the note.

I think what we're saying here is that the current reassignment functionality of certifications isn't acceptable behaviour in many of the organisations that we work with. 

Certifications are now being used heavily in compliance-driven organisations, such as health and human services. Many of our administrators have complex and sophisticated requirements and organisational and HR scenarios, and they need more flexibility in determining what happens for example when someone leaves and returns, which is very common in these services e.g. where staff are working on contracts or short term assignments. Reporting exact levels of compliance is absolutely critical for them as well. The learner experience isn't that good if the site uses multiple certifications because a user can receive a very large number of emails when they return after a period away.

Regards,

Tabitha
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Tabitha Parker - Tuesday, 27 July 2021, 6:48 PM
 

Each professional body has differing requirements too, so you can have quite a few different repeat or refresh times within one organisation because of the profession of the learner. 

Melinda Black
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Melinda Black - Wednesday, 24 November 2021, 2:52 PM
 

This is a brilliant idea. We are struggling with the same First Aid scenario currently with a large number of staff. If we could have the First Aid course in the Initial pathway and the CPR refresher in the re-certification pathway and then bump staff back to the initial pathway at year four that would save a lot of pain. 

Currently we are using 2 separate certifications, one for CPR and one for First Aid, but they require a double-up in courses that is causing confusion for staff and administrators.

A solution like this could be used for other refresher training scenarios as well.

Coby Rodwell
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Coby Rodwell - Wednesday, 6 July 2022, 4:56 PM
 
This is the same configuration we have looked at for First Aid: parallel certifications with the two different requirements.  We haven't fully implemented this yet so haven't reached the pain point of requiring the user to complete both certifications at once.

It would be great to have a better solution implemented in Totara instead.

Paul Lowndes
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Paul Lowndes - Thursday, 25 November 2021, 3:16 AM
Group Most Helpful Contributor 2021

+1 from us 


The scenario for us is vaccination training (flu and Covid) for pharmacists:

Y1 - face 2 face training

Y2 - online refresher 

Y3 - Online refresher

Y4 - face 2 face


Another more complex one is our Accuracy checking assistant training. certification is valid for 2 years. However if the learner changes employer before 2 years  they must take the recertification course.


We have set up the certification like this:

Y1 - Initial course A 

Y2 - Recertification course B


The only way we can see to cover this scenario is by opening up re-certification window almost immediately after they complete course A so if they change employers within 2 years they can then take course B and the expiry date will recalculate the 2 years from completing course B.


The problem is the due date alert now continually shows on the learner dashboard



Martin Sandberg
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Martin Sandberg - Thursday, 25 November 2021, 11:14 PM
Group Partners

Definiteley a plus 1 here as well.


We have this scenario

* Year 1 - Face to Face    (done in another system and imported via api)    (recertification window 3 months)
* Year 2 - Online  (recertification window 3 months)
* Year 3 - Online  (recertification window 3 months)
* Year 4 - Online  (recertification window 6 months)
* Year 5 - Face to Face (in the other system)  

An additional thing in year 4 is that there are other notifications with other timeframes as well as a wider recertification window

What we have had to do is continually creating new certifications and having automated removal of users from the older (no longer valid certifications)

Paula Hadlum
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Paula Hadlum - Friday, 8 September 2023, 1:55 AM
 

This sounds like something we are trying to achive.


Fire Safety with a 2 year renewal requiring users who did the elearning last time to be forced to do the seminar this time and unable to access the elearning again until the seminar has been completed. We really do not want to have to mess about with additional certifications as this would require us to get permission from the Trust Board to change how we report compliance to them at the highest level. It's hard to hide acitivities and courses from a dynamic group because the certification automatically gives them access regardless of any other rules.

We have not found a way to achieve it within the sytem yet. If Totara could change core coding to add this functionality, that would be great.

Georgina Christodoulou
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Georgina Christodoulou - Wednesday, 11 May 2022, 6:46 PM
Group 2022 Learner of the Year (Silver)Group Partners
Just adding some flowcharts with different scenarios
Richard Chambury
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Richard Chambury - Friday, 13 May 2022, 12:45 AM
Group Partners

Id like to add support to this request also.  We have scenarios where it would be useful to have recertification paths which mirror the course sets, so you can define as many recertification pathways as needed eg;

  • Year 1 complete the initial course set(s)
  • Year 2 complete the renewal course set(s)
  • Year 3 complete different course set(s)
  • Year 4 complete different course set(s)

It would also be very useful to include an option for expiry, so if a user expires which path should they return to eg the beginning, of if they expire on path 4 return to path 3 or the same path (and so on).

Another option that would be useful would be to set a return upon completion.So for example if they complete path 4 then return to path 2 to allow a greater level of flexibility eg.

  • Year 1 complete the initial course set(s)
  • Year 2 complete the renewal course set(s)
  • Year 3 complete different course set(s)
  • Year 4 complete different course set(s)
  • Year 5 return to Year 3

Whilst thinking about certification enhancements, the certification tab in the settings is limited in how it works which was problematic during (and before) the epidemic. During COVID customers needed to extend renewal periods and due dates to accommodate furlough and redeployment.

Certifications are primarily used to manage policy driven training, eg mandatory, statutory and essential training. In some situations the Active Period changes to meet local or national policy.  Currently when you change the Active Period it only applies when users move between paths and does not change users due dates if they are currently within a path. It would be useful to have an option on the Certification tab in settings to force the change to all assigned users, or only to users when they complete or expire. This would avoid having to rebuilt and upload legacy /existing completions to new certifications used to replace existing certifications when Active Periods change due to internal or national policy.  

This could also be applied to the window period, so if an admin needs to change the window period so it opens sooner or later than currently defined, that this applies to all assigned users immediately. Again we have seen customers having to rebuild certifications to manage this when they want to make changes.

Happy to provide more clarity if needed.

Duncan Eeles
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Duncan Eeles - Friday, 13 May 2022, 1:54 AM
Group Good learner 2023Group Partners

A very big +1 for to Richards additional comments. 

Thanks 

D

Paul Lowndes
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Paul Lowndes - Friday, 13 May 2022, 8:11 AM
Group Most Helpful Contributor 2021

Plus one on this from us. We face similar challenges 

Steph Wild
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Steph Wild - Tuesday, 17 May 2022, 6:21 AM
Group Learn Site Administrator

Hi,

A big +1 from us, we have struggled with a number of these issues in the past.  

This would be a great enhancement to certifications.


Emma Matthews
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Emma Matthews - Tuesday, 17 May 2022, 7:15 AM
 
A big +1 from us here too - these amendments would be a significant improvement for us and would reduce a lot of the current workarounds that we have to put in place because they are not as flexible as we would like.
Sarah Paisley
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Sarah Paisley - Tuesday, 17 May 2022, 2:03 PM
Group Learn Site Administrator

+1 here also.  We recently changed our recertification windows from 2 days post completion to 1 month prior to expiry to ensure course completions remained for reporting purposes.  However we now have to waitt for learners to recertify for this to take effect.  This is a particular issue with some of our longer certifcation e.g. 5 years.

Daniel Bond
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Daniel Bond - Monday, 23 May 2022, 7:55 AM
Group Most helpful contributor 2023

You should be able to do most reporting even where course data has been archived as long as you're using a Report Source that includes historical records.

Daniel Bond
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Daniel Bond - Monday, 23 May 2022, 1:25 AM
Group Most helpful contributor 2023

Totally agree, we definitely need more flexibility on things like renewal periods and the ability to define routes through a series of learning.

Appreciate it might be a bit of a stretch, but it would also be good if you're re-writing the certification functionality to allow variable renewal periods based on the route taken. As an example:

  • I complete one of the courses in the "Advanced Resuscitation" group of courses. I should be considered compliant for 4 years (as defined by the awarding body).
  • I complete one of the courses in the "Standard Resuscitation" group of courses. I should be considered compliant for 1 year.
  • If the window has opened (which we do almost as soon as someone has completed the learning) and I complete a "Standard Resuscitation" course more than a year from when I am due to expire (because I had previously done an "Advanced Resuscitation" course), Totara should add the record to history but not shorten the expiry date.

Either way, the thing I am compliant with is "Resuscitation" and there isn't a defined group that should be doing one or the other (so we wouldn't be able to just split it into two separate certifications).

Currently, we achieve the above by manually editing expiry dates from the default 1 year expiry for the certification to reflect whether it was a 1, 2, 3 or 4 year course that was completed.

Matt Barets
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Matt Barets - Tuesday, 24 May 2022, 1:46 AM
 

Another big +1 from us for Richard's comments, including the second part of his post.

Raechel Wilson
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Raechel Wilson - Saturday, 28 May 2022, 12:59 AM
 

+1 for this!

Coby Rodwell
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Coby Rodwell - Wednesday, 6 July 2022, 5:01 PM
 

This would be a great enhancement.  

We have the same difficulty with the first aid certification and recertification

harry woodward-clarke
Re: Define recertification pathways
by harry woodward-clarke - Monday, 15 August 2022, 6:32 PM
Group TXP Site Administrator

adding a "bump" to this as this in becoming an increasing important/urgent requirement - particularly with Health Sector client-partners.

.h

Ray Lawrence
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Ray Lawrence - Wednesday, 17 August 2022, 1:33 AM
Group Partners

+ 1 

Richard Chambury
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Richard Chambury - Wednesday, 2 August 2023, 3:27 AM
Group Partners

Bumping this again due to customer requests for updates on changes to certifications in upcoming versions.

Helen Dudley
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Helen Dudley - Monday, 11 September 2023, 5:28 PM
 

This would be a useful functionality so a plus one here too.

Joanne Pratt
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Joanne Pratt - Thursday, 2 November 2023, 7:46 AM
Group Most helpful contributor 2023

Yes please a big plus 1 to all the scenarios mentioned in this thread - thank you

Will Bladon
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Will Bladon - Thursday, 2 November 2023, 8:39 AM
 

Vote from me as well. Definitely functionality that is required within the healthcare sector.

Thanks all

Libby Doran
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Libby Doran - Sunday, 5 November 2023, 1:33 PM
 

Me too - this one is a no brainer and we cannot use certifications without this resolved. They are not functional.

Fiona Vallis
Re: Define recertification pathways
by Fiona Vallis - Thursday, 9 November 2023, 7:43 AM
 

We would really welcome this too, eg for Fire Safety we would like to specify eLearning year 1 and face to face training in year 2